Friday, 8 April 2011
Oblivious - Final Version Commentary
We have uploaded the final complete version of our opening sequence, with better edits and sound onto Youtube, the group blog and our own individual blogs. The final opening sequence is much more effective as we took on board the feedback and comments from teacher and peers when we showcased our sequence and used it to improve the film.
Friday, 1 April 2011
How are the sequences from Pillow Talk and Fringe different? Discuss the differences in pace and style as well as the effect the editing has on meaning/the audience's reception of the extracts?
Firstly, Pillow Talk and Fringe were made in completely different time periods. Pillow Talk was made in 1958 whereas Fringe was first shown in 2008 and is still a running programme. So from this alone we can automatically conclude that there are going to be differences in pace, style and editing due to changes in technology. These changes in technology affect the audience and its expectations.
Both extracts have different styles of editing. Analysing Pillow Talk, i observed lots of simple two shots. I think that this is because directors weren't fully aware of the variety of camera angles and shots back then. The majority of shots seem to be identical, they mainly consist of two shots, over the shoulder shots, long shots, mid shot or close up.
This completely differs to Fringe, which features a variety of shots and angles within the change of scenes. Close ups, extreme close ups, jumps into long shots, establishing and tracking shots have been used in order to make the action more exciting and interesting for the audience. It is rare for for modern programmes to feature only simple camera movement as the advanced
technology allows you to do so much more when filming.
I noticed that in Pillow Talk used a variety of editing styles to change scenes such as split screens, fades, dissolves and jump cuts. In the late 50's these editing styles were seen to be very modern and technically advanced for the era. In shot 2 of the extract at around 23 seconds, there is a fade from Rock Hudson's character and a friend talking about Doris Day's character to Doris Day herself. This has been done to identify her as the subject of their conversation and identify her to the audience as an important character. In shot 4 at around 30 seconds, a long shot of Doris Day's character becomes a split screen with Rock Hudson's character on the other side. This has been done for comic effect and to engage and involve the audience with the film, they can see both sides of the conversation and the characters facial expressions but the characters themselves can't.
In comparison, the editing style of Fringe is very modern. The cuts, which on average feature around every four seconds in comparison to Pillow Talk's thirty seconds are; slick, frequent and barely perceptible. This creates a sharp, precise effect and holds the audiences attention as long timings between cuts as in Pillow talk would bore them. Fringe features edits such as music and voiceovers, elements which don't feature in Pillow Talk. Dramatic music has been used to add emphasis to the action. The majority of shots show the characters separately which gives a clear view of them to the audience. Fringe is a dark, serious drama. This is reflected in the costume and setting, characters wear dark suits and location shots are in offices or of government buildings.
Pillow Talk is easy for audiences to follow as the uncomplicated style of editing gives the audience a good understanding of the characters and setting as it flows naturally. There is a lot of diegetic sound in Pillow Talk, in every shot you can hear some background noise. For example, you hear a phone ringing, people talking and background music in the restaurant. This creates a more realistic feel as the characters have been placed in an ordinary social situation which audiences can recognise and relate to.
I think that the reason Pillow Talk and Fringe are so different is because they have different target audiences. Pillow Talk is a romantic comedy whereas Fringe can be placed into several genre groups such drama, thriller, mystery and sci-fi. This means producers will seek to appeal to their audiences with their editing, style and pace.
Firstly, Pillow Talk and Fringe were made in completely different time periods. Pillow Talk was made in 1958 whereas Fringe was first shown in 2008 and is still a running programme. So from this alone we can automatically conclude that there are going to be differences in pace, style and editing due to changes in technology. These changes in technology affect the audience and its expectations.
Both extracts have different styles of editing. Analysing Pillow Talk, i observed lots of simple two shots. I think that this is because directors weren't fully aware of the variety of camera angles and shots back then. The majority of shots seem to be identical, they mainly consist of two shots, over the shoulder shots, long shots, mid shot or close up.
This completely differs to Fringe, which features a variety of shots and angles within the change of scenes. Close ups, extreme close ups, jumps into long shots, establishing and tracking shots have been used in order to make the action more exciting and interesting for the audience. It is rare for for modern programmes to feature only simple camera movement as the advanced
technology allows you to do so much more when filming.
I noticed that in Pillow Talk used a variety of editing styles to change scenes such as split screens, fades, dissolves and jump cuts. In the late 50's these editing styles were seen to be very modern and technically advanced for the era. In shot 2 of the extract at around 23 seconds, there is a fade from Rock Hudson's character and a friend talking about Doris Day's character to Doris Day herself. This has been done to identify her as the subject of their conversation and identify her to the audience as an important character. In shot 4 at around 30 seconds, a long shot of Doris Day's character becomes a split screen with Rock Hudson's character on the other side. This has been done for comic effect and to engage and involve the audience with the film, they can see both sides of the conversation and the characters facial expressions but the characters themselves can't.
In comparison, the editing style of Fringe is very modern. The cuts, which on average feature around every four seconds in comparison to Pillow Talk's thirty seconds are; slick, frequent and barely perceptible. This creates a sharp, precise effect and holds the audiences attention as long timings between cuts as in Pillow talk would bore them. Fringe features edits such as music and voiceovers, elements which don't feature in Pillow Talk. Dramatic music has been used to add emphasis to the action. The majority of shots show the characters separately which gives a clear view of them to the audience. Fringe is a dark, serious drama. This is reflected in the costume and setting, characters wear dark suits and location shots are in offices or of government buildings.
Pillow Talk is easy for audiences to follow as the uncomplicated style of editing gives the audience a good understanding of the characters and setting as it flows naturally. There is a lot of diegetic sound in Pillow Talk, in every shot you can hear some background noise. For example, you hear a phone ringing, people talking and background music in the restaurant. This creates a more realistic feel as the characters have been placed in an ordinary social situation which audiences can recognise and relate to.
I think that the reason Pillow Talk and Fringe are so different is because they have different target audiences. Pillow Talk is a romantic comedy whereas Fringe can be placed into several genre groups such drama, thriller, mystery and sci-fi. This means producers will seek to appeal to their audiences with their editing, style and pace.
Summary of group Q
As a group I believe we worked considerably well together. We didn't come accross any major problem with our work. I feel that we communicated well and told eachother how we felt we could improve our work though constructive criticism. We seemed to keep up to date with the work load and met all deadlines.
Film opening showcase
We recently showcased a rough cut of our film to our media class. The feedback was very positive, overall the group felt that the continuity and the control of the narrative was good but the shots were too long which took away the element of suspense. It was suggested that we cut a lot of unnecessary footage out, cut more frequently and add non diegetic sound in as our film currently only has diegetic sound. We knew that music needed to be added which is our next priority aswell as cutting the clip down. Overall our film got high ratings which is a good thing which makes us feel more positive about our film. The group also felt that our credits needed more work as the names flashed up too quickly and the font didn't fit in with the theme of the film.
The film's title has been changed from 141 to Oblivious as we felt it had more relevance to the film
The film's title has been changed from 141 to Oblivious as we felt it had more relevance to the film
Friday, 25 March 2011
Cutting it - Mise-en-scene
Mise-en-scene
On location
- In cab
- Outside hospital
- On the street
- Urban setting
Costume
- Everyday clothes
- Casual
- Makeup - neutral, minimal
Lighting
- Daylight
- Natural
- Low light in office
- Bright/sunny on her face - looks positive changes to Dull/dreary and grey when she comes out - as if she has bad news
Colour
- Dull
- Neutral
- Bright folder - shows importance
Significant props
- Wedding ring
- Knocked over flowers
- Folder (Medical records)
On road
- Cars moving
- People walking
- People sitting at the cafe - everyday life
On location
- In cab
- Outside hospital
- On the street
- Urban setting
Costume
- Everyday clothes
- Casual
- Makeup - neutral, minimal
Lighting
- Daylight
- Natural
- Low light in office
- Bright/sunny on her face - looks positive changes to Dull/dreary and grey when she comes out - as if she has bad news
Colour
- Dull
- Neutral
- Bright folder - shows importance
Significant props
- Wedding ring
- Knocked over flowers
- Folder (Medical records)
On road
- Cars moving
- People walking
- People sitting at the cafe - everyday life
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)